Clarifying Six Major Misconceptions About Stablecoins

·

Stablecoins have entered a phase of rapid growth since the second half of 2023, with their current market size exceeding $230 billion and active accounts surpassing 250 million. Their integration with traditional payment systems and banking infrastructures highlights their transformative role in global financial innovation. However, persistent misconceptions about stablecoins hinder policy consensus regarding their development for offshore or onshore RMB applications. This article addresses six critical misunderstandings to foster a balanced perspective on stablecoins’ functional attributes and strategic value.


Misconception 1: Equating Stablecoins with Generic Cryptocurrencies

Reality: Stablecoins are a distinct subset of cryptoassets, differentiated by their stability mechanisms and semi-centralized governance.

Key Takeaway: Regulatory bodies (e.g., EU, Japan) classify stablecoins as payment tools, not speculative assets.


Misconception 2: Stablecoins Lack Value Stability

Reality: Incidents like USDC’s depegging during the 2023 Silicon Valley Bank crisis are exceptions, not the norm.

👉 Explore how top stablecoins maintain stability


Misconception 3: Stablecoins Conflict with CBDCs

Reality: They serve complementary roles.

FeatureCBDCsStablecoins
ScopeDomestic retail/wholesaleCross-border/DeFi ecosystems
GovernanceCentralizedSemi-decentralized
ExampleDigital RMBUSDT in mBridge projects

Synergy: Projects like Hong Kong’s Aurum demonstrate hybrid CBDC-stablecoin systems.


Misconception 4: Stablecoins Erode Monetary Sovereignty

Reality: Controlled adoption mitigates risks.

Case Study: The Eurodollar market coexists with Fed policies despite global reach.


Misconception 5: Stablecoins Hinder Currency Internationalization

Reality: They amplify reach.

Data Point: Stablecoin transactions ($7T/year) already rival Visa+Mastercard combined.


Misconception 6: Stablecoins Fuel Illicit Finance

Reality: Advanced tracking and regulations curb abuse.

👉 Learn about blockchain anti-money laundering tech


FAQ Section

Q1: Are stablecoins safer than Bitcoin?
A1: Yes—fiat-backed stablecoins have lower volatility and higher regulatory oversight.

Q2: Can CBDCs replace stablecoins?
A2: Unlikely; their use cases differ (e.g., CBDCs for domestic vs. stablecoins for global settlements).

Q3: How do regulators prevent stablecoin misuse?
A3: Via reserve audits, transaction caps, and AML frameworks like MiCA.

Q4: Will RMB stablecoins boost China’s financial influence?
A4: Potentially, by enhancing RMB’s role in trade and DeFi ecosystems.


Conclusion: Stablecoins are pivotal to the future of finance. By debunking myths, policymakers can harness their potential for RMB internationalization while ensuring robust safeguards. Stakeholders should prioritize:

  1. Offshore pilots for RMB stablecoins.
  2. Collaborative regulation aligning with global standards.
  3. Public education to demystify stablecoin mechanics.