The Potential for Ethereum to Reverse Its Decline

·

Ethereum has been facing systemic issues that have led to stagnant token prices and a loss of confidence among holders. In the worst-case scenario, users might abandon ETH in favor of other layer-1 tokens like SOL. This could trigger a chain reaction where validators, facing reduced transaction fee rewards, unstake and exit the network. A mass validator exodus would weaken blockchain security, jeopardizing the safety of on-chain assets—a risk that major stakeholders (whales) are likely more concerned about than retail investors. Therefore, monitoring Ethereum's Total Value Locked (TVL) for signs of decline is crucial. If whales exit due to security concerns, it could create a death spiral, pushing Ethereum toward collapse.

While this scenario is highly unlikely, it underscores a critical flaw in Proof-of-Stake (PoS) systems: their inherent vulnerability to declining token prices. Blockchain systems operate within capitalist frameworks where individuals act in their own best interest. Idealism alone cannot override economic incentives.

But is this a terminal condition? Not necessarily. Systems evolve, and solutions exist to revitalize ETH’s price. Below are key strategies to Make Ethereum Great Again.


Revamping L2 Contributions to L1

Imagine Ethereum as a wealthy but generous parent raising numerous L2 "children." Initially, these L2s contributed revenue to Ethereum (the parent), ensuring sustainability. However, EIP-4844 drastically reduced these contributions, straining Ethereum’s finances. Meanwhile, L2s thrive by offloading costs onto the parent chain—often while planning token launches to extract further value from users.

Enforcing ETH Staking Requirements for L2s

L2 transactions rely heavily on L1’s low gas and blob fees. To realign incentives:

Why Burning ETH Isn’t the Solution

Forcing L2s to burn ETH would likely shift costs to users, negating L2’s affordability advantage. Instead, staking mechanisms better align long-term incentives.


Avoiding the "Settlement Layer" Trap

Ethereum’s potential shift toward becoming a universal settlement layer poses risks:


Additional Strategies

Uniswap & ENS L2s: Hidden Potential?

Recent announcements of Uniswap and Ethereum Name Service (ENS) launching dedicated L2s may signal new models for L2-L1 value redistribution. If these projects pioneer mechanisms to benefit Ethereum while scaling, they could set precedents for other L2s. Otherwise, their departure risks further draining ETH’s momentum.

Boosting Staking Rates

With ~30% of ETH already staked, increasing this ratio could reduce circulating supply. Potential avenues:


FAQ Section

Q: Can Ethereum recover from its current downturn?
A: Yes, through strategic upgrades (e.g., L2 fee reforms), narrative reinforcement (e.g., world computer), and institutional adoption (e.g., staking-enabled ETFs).

Q: Why is EIP-4844 problematic?
A: While reducing costs for users, it undercuts Ethereum’s revenue from L2s, necessitating alternative funding mechanisms like staking mandates.

Q: How might Uniswap’s L2 help Ethereum?
A: If designed to repatriate value to L1 (e.g., via ETH staking), it could inspire other L2s to follow suit.

👉 Explore Ethereum’s latest staking trends

Note: All non-OKX hyperlinks have been removed per guidelines.